Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 03:56

Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
GUNTHER wins the world heavyweight championship back from Jey Uso - Cageside Seats
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
What is the kinkiest thing you and your sex partner have done in bed?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Thank you.
Lighter than normal WWDC expected without significant Apple Intelligence uprgrades - AppleInsider
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
What symptoms did you notice before being diagnosed with cancer?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
A chemical in acne medicine can help regenerate limbs - Yahoo
What’s next?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Russell's F1 Canadian GP win in doubt after Red Bull protest - Autosport